GEO guide
Entities and primary sources, extractable content, structured data, third-party sources, correction of dated narratives, technical work, monitoring. What is done, where, and what to expect from each intervention.
A GEO plan is not a list of generic tips: it is the list of interventions that change the sources from which AI engines build their answers about you. The interventions fall into seven families. Not all of them apply to everyone: the action plan of each assessment says which ones matter in your case, in what order and with what expected effect.
Models must first of all understand who you are: exact name, industry, headquarters, size, key people, and not confuse you with namesakes. The sources they use for this are few and well known:
Expected effect: answers that identify you correctly and a stable entity to which models can attach the subsequent facts.
Included in the assessment: Wikidata entry created or completed, LinkedIn page aligned, Google Business and Bing Places checked, consistent data across all sources. With the GEO Program: a new Wikipedia article, registers and directories beyond the first three.
AI engines do not read pages the way people do: they extract self-contained passages. A website full of advertising claims and poor in facts offers nothing to extract. We intervene with:
Included in the assessment: a "facts and figures" page and the FAQ of the key page, drafted, reviewed by us and ready to publish. With the GEO Program: articles, white papers, case studies, microsites and topic hubs, and the revision of existing pages.
Schema.org data (Organization, Person, Product, Service, FAQPage, Article) tell machines what is on the page and link it to the entity: same names, same identifiers, same profiles (sameAs) everywhere. We check consistency of name, address and contacts across all sources ("NAP consistency") and add the missing nodes.
Included in the assessment: Organization and Person JSON-LD with sameAs, FAQPage schema for the FAQ delivered, ready to upload. With the GEO Program: Product, Service and Article across the whole catalogue or blog.
This is the family with the greatest weight, because models trust what others say about you more than what you say yourself. Depending on the audience:
Included in the assessment: a complete listing on up to three category directories indicated by the plan. With the GEO Program: press and interviews, review campaigns, community and forum presence, ongoing LinkedIn posts.
The most common cause of wrong answers is not a false source: it is a true but old source, contradicted by nothing more recent. A closed lawsuit, a restructuring years ago, a discontinued product. It is corrected with:
Included in the assessment: Wikidata and listings updated, one documented proposal on the Wikipedia talk page, a "what has changed" page drafted if the source map calls for it. With the GEO Program: press releases, articles and public replies over time.
The previous interventions are useless if machines cannot read the pages:
Included in the assessment: AI crawlability audit of the site (16 crawlers, 10 checks), robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap and IndexNow ready to upload, Bing Webmaster Tools and Search Console properties with the sitemap submitted. With access to the site we apply them ourselves. With the GEO Program: work on the CMS, speed and site architecture.
No intervention is final: models update, sources change, competitors move. The 90-day re-analysis is included in every assessment; with the GEO Program the run is monthly, with alerts on negative narratives and a quarterly before/after report.
The baseline actions are included in the assessment price and we carry them out: the one-off actions, with predictable effort, on the company's own channels and on open primary sources. Everything that requires serial content production, relationships with third parties or ongoing presence is the GEO Program, quoted on the plan. In between sits your team, which can carry out any action in the plan with our instructions.
| Family | Included in the assessment | GEO Program |
|---|---|---|
| Entities and primary sources | Wikidata, LinkedIn, Google Business, Bing Places, consistent data | New Wikipedia article, registers and other directories |
| Extractable content | Facts page and FAQ, drafted and ready | Articles, white papers, case studies, microsites |
| Structured data | Organization, Person, FAQPage | Product, Service, Article across the site |
| Third-party sources | Up to three category directories | Press, interviews, reviews, communities, LinkedIn |
| Dated narratives | Wikidata, one Wikipedia proposal, "what has changed" page drafted | Press releases, articles, public replies over time |
| Technical | Crawlability audit, robots, llms.txt, sitemap, IndexNow, Bing and Search Console | CMS, speed, architecture |
| Monitoring | 90-day re-analysis | Monthly runs, alerts, quarterly report |
Details and price are on the Pricing page.
Frequently asked questions
The technical ones and those on primary sources: unblocking crawlers, completing Wikidata and listings, publishing the facts page. They are also the ones included in the assessment. Visible effects in browsing-based answers in 4-8 weeks.
Yes, if you want: facts pages, FAQs, definitions, "what has changed" pages, press contributions. Always under your control and, in life sciences, within the regulatory perimeter.
In compliance with Wikipedia's rules: we propose documented updates on talk pages, with sources, without direct edits by the company. On Wikidata, which has different rules, the update is direct.
Free audit in 48 hours
A free demo audit, no commitment: real AI answers about your brand and an indicative GEO Score, presented on a call.