GEO Investor Assessment
Analysis and monitoring of what AI engines tell analysts, funds and counterparties about soundness, governance and risks — before the first meeting.
Question“Is Velaria Group a good investment? What are the risks?”
AI answerVelaria Group operates in a competitive market. Sources from 2021 mention financial strain and a restructuring round.1 Governance is described as not very transparent by some observers.2 [No mention of recent results, debt reduction or the new business plan.]3
Illustrative example with a fictitious company. In the assessment every note links to the source URL.
The GEO Investor Assessment is the service that analyses what analysts, funds and counterparties read when they ask generative AI about a company's soundness, governance and risks — before the data room — and how to correct the sources that form that first judgement.
What has changed
“Is [Company] worth investing in?”
“What are the risks of [Company]?”
“How is the governance of [Company]?”
Sources: OpenAI / press 2025 · Pew Research 2025 · SparkToro 2024 — US / cross-industry data, to be read as a trend.
The problem
And the judgement forms before the first meeting.
The sources that matter
Articles on strain, restructuring or disputes: the heaviest sources in questions about risks and governance.
AI reads them if published as HTML with extractable data; scanned PDFs and presentations are not picked up.
Corporate structure, leadership, dates: the base on which models attach financial facts.
Discussions with dated opinions weigh on Perplexity and ChatGPT in "is it worth investing" questions.
The solution
We put the real questions of your audience to several models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot), by market and role.
We identify the actual articles and pages that form that perception, with verified URLs.
Score, gaps and concrete actions per touchpoint. Your team executes them, or we do: content, sources, presence. Then we measure again.
What you receive: GEO Score A–F · Visual SWOT · Source map · Reputational risks · Action plan · Competitor comparison. One branded report, exportable to PDF, generated by the proprietary ReputAction platform. And with monitoring, the same snapshot repeated over time: you see how far your positioning has moved.
A case, anonymised
"What are the risks" produced a montage of 2021 sources on financial strain; the new business plan and debt reduction never appeared. The plan made IR releases and data extractable in HTML, updated Wikipedia with sources, published a "what has changed" page and secured trade coverage with the updated data. At 90 days the answers cite the business plan in three cases out of four; the 2021 strain appears with its date and the subsequent context.
Inside the platform
Monthly score and alerts: if a dated source re-enters the answers on risks or governance, you know before the next due diligence.
ReputAction platform interface, with sample data about a fictitious company.
Frequently asked questions
Blog
The most common problem in assessments is not a false source but a true, old source that nothing has updated. How dated narratives arise, why models repeat them and the five interventions that move them.
Read →What ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews actually cite when they talk about a company: the 2026 data on the most used sources, the differences between engines and what it means for those who want to be cited.
Read →The same assessment, for your industry
In life sciences? This assessment exists in a version dedicated to pharma, within the regulatory perimeter.
The next step
Start with the free 48-hour audit; then the GEO Assessment, from €5,000, with the baseline actions carried out by us and the 90-day re-analysis; the GEO Program for everything else.
Free audit in 48 hours
A free demo audit, no commitment: real AI answers about your brand and an indicative GEO Score, presented on a call.