Life Sciences · GEO Brand Assessment

When AI recommends your category, does it recommend you?

Analysis and monitoring of the presence of your corporate and consumer health brands in the answers of ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity — within the regulatory perimeter.

Request the free 48-hour audit

Example sample: 480 questions to five engines, one dot per answer
ChatGPTGeminiPerplexityClaudeCopilot
  • 51%Correct
  • 18%Dated facts
  • 13%Unattended sources
  • 18%Doesn't name you
ChatGPT · the circled answer in the sample, annotated with its sources

Question“Recommend a good magnesium supplement.”

AI answerAmong the most recommended products are those of [Competitor A] and [Competitor B], praised for formulation and reviews.1 Meridian Consumer Health rarely appears; in 2020 a batch of one of its products was recalled as a precaution.2 [No mention of the current range, supporting studies or quality certifications.]3

  1. UnattendedThe recommended products come from rankings on consumer sites and from the reviews of an e-commerce store.review sites · e-commerce
  2. DatedThe 2020 precautionary recall is the only news about the brand among the sources read.consumer news site · 2020
  3. MissingThe current range and the supporting studies are published only on the product website.product website, not cited

Illustrative example with a fictitious company. In the assessment every note links to the source URL.

The GEO Brand Assessment for life sciences is the service that analyses whether and how corporate and consumer health brands appear in the recommendations of generative AI, within the regulatory perimeter: which competitors are recommended, which sources the answers depend on and which actions to take.

What has changed

Consumers no longer compare ten product pages. They ask the AI and get one answer.

“What is the best [product] for...?”

“What is the difference between [Brand] and [Competitor]?”

“Which brand can I trust for [category]?”

×2ChatGPT weekly users doubled in a year: from ~400 to ~800–900 million
8%click-through when an AI answer appears (vs 15% without): your product page is not opened
60%of searches already end without a single click: the answer is enough

Sources: OpenAI / press 2025 · Pew Research 2025 · SparkToro 2024 — US / cross-industry data, to be read as a trend.

The problem

If the AI does not name you, you do not exist for the person asking.

And the media budget keeps chasing channels the AI does not read.

The sources that matter

Where the answer comes from, for this audience

Online pharmacies and marketplaces

For consumer health, AI picks up ratings and recurring themes from aggregated reviews.

Pharmacovigilance news

Recalls and warnings remain heavy sources for years: the closure of the case must be made readable.

Institutional and scientific sources

AIFA, EMA, PubMed: AI cites them as authorities; what is published there weighs more than any product sheet.

Product sheets and SmPCs in HTML

Leaflets and sheets in PDF are not extracted; in HTML, with FAQs, they are.

The solution

How the GEO Assessment works

1

We ask the AI engines

We put the real questions of your audience to several models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot), by market and role.

2

We find the sources

We identify the actual articles and pages that form that perception, with verified URLs.

3

We give you the plan, and carry it out

Score, gaps and concrete actions per touchpoint. Your team executes them, or we do: content, sources, presence. Then we measure again.

What you receive: GEO Score A–F · Visual SWOT · Source map · Reputational risks · Action plan · Competitor comparison. One branded report, exportable to PDF, generated by the proprietary ReputAction platform. And with monitoring, the same snapshot repeated over time: you see how far your positioning has moved.

The method in detail →

A case, anonymised

Consumer health, range of supplements, precautionary recall in 2020

In category questions competitors dominated; in branded ones the recall was the main fact. The plan made sheets and FAQs readable in HTML, published the closure of the case with institutional sources, secured presence in two industry comparisons and looked after replies to reviews. At 90 days the brand appears in 40% of category answers on Perplexity and ChatGPT and the recall is cited with its date and closure.

All results →

Inside the platform

Your brand against the peer set, dimension by dimension

Presence in recommendations, sentiment, freshness and authority of sources: where the competitor beats you, and why.

Competitor comparison view: Meridian C 58 vs Competitor Alpha A 81 on five dimensions

ReputAction platform interface, with sample data about a fictitious company.

Frequently asked questions

GEO Brand Assessment for Life Sciences: the essential answers

What is the GEO Brand Assessment for Life Sciences?

The GEO Brand Assessment for life sciences is the service that analyses whether and how corporate and consumer health brands appear in the recommendations of generative AI, within the regulatory perimeter: which competitors are recommended, which sources the answers depend on and which actions to take.

How does the analysis work?

We ask several AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot) the real questions your audience asks, identify the sources that shape the answers, with verified URLs, and deliver a GEO Score from A to F, a SWOT, reputational risks and an action plan per channel. The demo audit is ready in 48 hours.

How do you stay within the regulatory perimeter?

The analysis covers corporate and consumer health brands and the company's reputation, never promotional activity on prescription medicines. The method observes AI answers and the public sources that shape them, in line with industry rules.

Can you work on prescription medicines?

No: the analysis and interventions concern corporate and consumer health brands, never the promotion of prescription medicines. It is a regulatory limit we respect by method.

Does AI cite institutional sources?

Yes, and prefers them: AIFA, EMA, studies on PubMed. A fact present in an institutional source weighs more than any product sheet; that is why the closure of a case should be documented there where possible.

Who carries out the actions in the plan?

Your team, or us: every action in the report is operational (updating sources, making pages and listings readable by AI, looking after reviews and Wikipedia) and we can carry it out directly, or work alongside whoever already runs your channels.

How do I measure results (ROI)?

Through monitoring: periodic runs of the same questions on the same AI engines, GEO Score over time and a before/after comparison for each intervention. You see how far your positioning has moved against the investment, and an alert warns you if a negative narrative emerges.

How do we start, and what does it cost?

You start with a free demo audit, presented on a call within 48 hours: real AI answers about your brand and an indicative GEO Score. The full GEO Assessment starts from €5,000 for one audience and one country, with the baseline actions carried out by us and the 90-day re-analysis; the GEO Program, for serial content, PR, communities and monitoring, is quoted on the plan. Details are on the Pricing page.

The same assessment, for your industry

Not in life sciences? The same assessment exists in a standard version, for every industry.

Cross-industry version →

The next step

Start with the free 48-hour audit; then the GEO Assessment, from €5,000, with the baseline actions carried out by us and the 90-day re-analysis; the GEO Program for everything else.

Pricing and what is included →

Free audit in 48 hours

Want to see what AI says about you? We show you in 48 hours.

A free demo audit, no commitment: real AI answers about your brand and an indicative GEO Score, presented on a call.

No newsletter: we only contact you to reply.